Genre Theory
Steve Neale
Belief
that genre is in constant flux, changing and evolving
Five
main stages in film genre:
-
the form finding itself (psycho)
-
the classic (Halloween)
-
stretching the genre boundaries (nightmare on elm street)
-
parody (scary movie)
-
homage (scream)
Andre Baslin
Introduced
the idea of genre theory in films looking at westerns in the 1950s
He was
the first to look at the significant advantages of genre from the point of view
of the institutional perspective e.g. reuse of sets, props etc. and as more
than simply arbitrary: these originated at production level
Robert Stam
Genre
is hard to define, doesn’t really exist and is a concept made up by theorists
and critics
He
argues the 4 main problems:
Extension- the breadth or narrowness
of labels
Normativism- having pre-conceived ideas
of criteria for genre membership, does horror look the same to others as it
does to me
Monolithic- definitions (as if an item
belonged to only one genre) a film should fit in one genre
Biologism- a kind of essentialism in which genres are
seen as evolving through a standardized life cycle
Rick Altman
Semantic- e.g. how to film is portrayed
signs like knives, blood, dark colours show the audience that it’s a horror film,
easy for the audience to recognise and identify.
But
you cant have fun without the other. Need to have the marriage of the two to
properly display a genre
Syntactic- themes and plot, what the
film is about e.g. fear, revenge, rage
Bordwell
‘one
could…argue that no set of necessary and sufficient conditions can mark off
genres from other sorts of groupings in ways that all experts or ordinary film
goers would find acceptable’ there’s no checklist for every genre
no
one way to classify genre effectively e.g. mother movie
Audience
Theory
Richard Dyer
Audiences
want media products that offer them utopian solutions (perfect world) to their
problems happy ending(1992). They want to be offered diversions and escapism.
Blumber and Katz
Uses
and Gratification: Helps us understand why and how people seek out specific media to
satisfy specific needs.
Audience
centred approach about mass communication. Diverging from other media effect
theories that question what does media do to people? It focuses on what do media
do with media?
Gives
the consumer power to discern what media they consume, with the assumption that
the consumer has a clear intent and use
Moves
consumers on from being the victims of mass media, forcefully fed what
production companies pick, to seeing them as an audience to whom the media must
appeal, competing with other diversions for their attention.
Makes
the consumer active and not passive.
1.
the audience is conceived as active
2.
in the mass communication process, most initiative in linking gratification and
media choice lies with the audience member. You have more control.
3.
the media compete with other sources of satisfaction (dinner, park etc.)
4.
methodologically speaking, many of the goals of mass media use can be derived
from data supplied by individual audience members themselves. E.g. when watching
on Netflix – you may also like... about who you are, people are supplying
information about yourself to media companies
5.
value judgements about the cultural significance of mass communication should
be suspended while audience orientations are explored on their own terms.
Media
use can be grouped in 5 uses.
1.
be informed or educated
2.
identify with characters of the situation in the media environment
3.
simple entertainment
4.
enhance social interaction
5.
escape from the stresses of everyday life
Hypodermic
needle
Suggesting
that an intended message is directly received and wholly accepted by the
receiver
However,
it is based on assumptions about human nature, rather than empirical findings
and is discounted by some
People
are not simply empty vessels waiting to be influenced by the media
Stuart Hall
(1970s)
Encoding-
the creation of texts
Decoding-
the interpretation of texts
Cant
predict how something will be decoded
Just
because you have an idea doesn’t mean that is what your audience is going to
see and believe
Theoretical
approach of how media message re produced, disseminated, and interpreted
Interpreted
in different ways depending on individuals cultural background, economic
standings, and personal experiences
Culture
was not something to simply appreciate or study, but a ‘critical site of social
action and intervention, where power relations are both established and
potentially unsettled’.
Audience
members can play an active role in decoding messages as they rely on their own
social contexts, and might be capable of changing messages themselves through
collective action.
Representation
Theory
Levi Strauss
binary opposites
Laura Mulvey
Male gaze woman are
objectified and seen as sex objects
Virgin/whore
dichotomy
Vladimir Prop
usually hero are strong
men, helpers black men, princess weak girl
Angela McRobie
believes that media like to
use conformed and stereotypical gender roles- men are leaders and in control,
women are victims and carers
Felt
it was damaging for people to only be displayed this way
Stanley Cohen
certain groups get
demonised through their negative representation, moral panic about this group
bell hooks
wrote a book called ‘aint I
a woman’ to talk about the problems of being a black female in America.
Intersectionality- the convergence of sexuality and racism during slavery
contributed to black women having the lowest status and worst conditions of any
group in American society.
stereotypes
refusing to die: devolution of black femininity and rape of black women. Black
women are seen as dangerous and more sexually promiscuous seen as a threat to
the patriarchy, contrast to non-gender conformity for white women. Thinks that
the gaze doesn’t apply to black women.
Liesbet van zoonen
feels that women’s and
men’s bodies are represented in different ways. The internet is not a feminist
utopia nbased on collaboration because this view is too simple, ignores the
dich diversity of how gender is articulated on the internet. Gender is
performative- we construct out ideas about masculinity and feminity form ‘what
we do’ rather than ‘what we are’. We are judged in how successful we are for
being a women or a male
Narrative
Theory
Tzvetan Todorov
suggests that all narratives follow a three part
structure where they begin with equilibrium, where everything is balanced,
progress as something comes along to disrupt that equilibrium, and finally
reach a resolution, when equilibrium is restored.
These are the steps for all traditional stories:1. Equilibrium (everything is as it should
be)2. Disruption (by an event)
3. Recognition of disruption
4. Attempts to repair disruption
5. Return to equilibrium
In the movie 'Would you rather' an example of
equilibrium is that the main character and her brother have been left in debt
because their parents have died. The brother need medical help but they cannot
afford it. The main character is offered a chance to win
some money and get a donor for her brother. In order to do this she has to join
the games with the other patients. Before the games begins the characters realize
that there is something wrong because one of the players is shot just because
they want to leave the games. The first game was electrifying each other. All
the characters begin to realize that they will be torturing each other. The characters try to work together to find a way
to escape the games. However this did not work and they are brought back into
the games.
Allen
Cameron
4 types of narrative
1. Anachronic
modular narratives involve the use of flashbacks
and/or flashforwards, with no clear dominance between any of the narrative
threads. These narratives also often repeat scenes directly or via a different
perspective. Examples of these in films would be 'Vantage Point', 'Click' and
'50 First Dates'.
2. Forking Paths
Forking-path narratives juxtapose alternative
versions of a story, showing the possible outcomes that might result from small
changes in a single event or group of events. The forking-path narrative
introduces a number of plot lines that usually contradict one another. Examples
of these include 'Mr Nobody', 'Source Code' and 'Groundhog Day'
3. Episodic
Episodic narratives are organised as an abstract
series or narrative anthology. Abstract series type of modular narrative is
characterized by the operation of a non- narrative formal system which appears
to dictate (or at least overlay) the organization of narrative elements such as
a sequence of numbers or the alphabet. Anthology consists of a series of
shorter tales which are apparently disconnected but share a random similarity,
such as all ‘episodes’ being survivors of a shipwreck. Examples of these would
be 'Heroes', 'Lost' or 'Game of Thrones'.
4. Split Screens
Split screen narratives are different from the
other types of modular narrative discussed here, because their modularity is
articulated along spatial rather than temporal lines. These films divide the
screen into two or more frames, juxtaposing events within the same visual
field, in a sustained fashion. An example of this would be 500 Days of Summer:
Levi Strauss
states that we see the world, people and places by
forming Binary Oppositions. His
theory states that all narratives are arranged around the conflict between the
opposites. Binary opposites help to thicken the plot and further the
narrative; and introduce contrast.
e.g. superhero film
Good Vs Evil
Men Vs Women
Light Vs Dark
Technology Vs
Nature
War Vs Peace
Age Vs Youth
Strong Vs Weak
Democracy Vs
Dictatorship
Vladimir Prop
He noticed that often many Folk tales were similar in a variety areas.
He identified a theory about characters and actions as narrative functions. According
the Vladimir Propp, characters have a narrative function; they provide a
structure for the text.
The typical characters he found were:
The Hero – a character that seeks something.
The Villain – who opposes or actively blocks the hero’s quest.
The Donor – who provides an object with magical properties.
The Dispatcher – who sends the hero on his/her quest via a message.
The False Hero – who disrupts the hero’s success by making false claims.
The Helper – who aids the hero.
The Princess – acts as the reward for the hero and the object of the
villain’s plots.
Her Father – who acts to reward the hero for his effort.
In a struggle scene Vladimir Propp suggested this theory: There is a
struggle between the hero and the villain. The hero is branded. The villain is
overcome. The state of disorder is settled. And the recognition scene: At this
stage in the film the hero is recognised. (an action film, like superman) Or
the false hero or villain is unmasked. (a horror film scene) As well as the
false hero could be punished in this scene. (a cops and robbers scene)Or the
hero attains the reward (princess/ kingdom).. and they live happily ever after.
(a fairytale)
The
unknown theorist:
Unrestricted
narration- e.g. the audience has seen someone die, but a character is still
trying to save them. (dramatic irony)
Restricted
narration- you are not given full information, do not know what is happening
e.g. frozen: only at the end you find out prince hans just wants the throne not Ana.
Comments
Post a Comment